Preparing for extreme heat
Delivering a citizens’ jury on climate adaptation
#DELIBERATION #ENGAGEMENT
Overview
Challenge
One of the major impacts of climate change in cities is extreme heat, often referred to as the ‘silent killer’. In 2022, when temperatures reached over 40 degrees Celsius in the UK for the first time, over 4,500 excess deaths were recorded in England, with the highest mortality rate in London. The impacts of extreme heat are not shared fairly, with older adults, young children, people living with disabilities and people living in poor quality housing most most at risk.
Hackney Council were interested in involving residents to ensure their action on climate change was guided by equity. Involve worked with Sortition Foundation to deliver their first-ever Citizens’ Climate Jury, where residents responded to the question:
How can Hackney Council and others make sure that residents, especially those who are most affected, are protected from very hot weather as our climate changes?
Outcome
The Citizens' Climate Jury brought together 15 residents who broadly reflected the borough to learn about the topic, deliberate solutions and agree on a set of nine priority recommendations. Hackney Council published their formal response to the recommendations in full, outlining their commitment to:
develop a new communications approach tailored to those who are most vulnerable to the impact of extreme heat
open, map and promote cool spaces, such as council buildings, libraries and shaded areas
increase Hackney’s street tree canopy coverage within areas most in need
incentivise companies to exceed building regulations to raise environmental standards
develop an Urban Forest Plan to protect, manage and increase tree canopy
Role - Engagement Lead at Involve, working alongside a Project Officer and additional facilitators
Timescale - 6 months (Jan - June 2024)
15
jury members
recruited by democratic lottery to broadly reflect the borough
11
speakers
provided information and evidence
180
person hours
of learning, deliberation and decision making
Approach
Jury design
A citizens’ jury is a group of people from different walks of life brought together to learn about a topic, deliberate options and make recommendations. Deliberative methods offer a route to move beyond polarised opinions by understanding the public’s considered judgement on a topic.
The Hackney Citizens’ Jury was designed over a period of four months, through close collaboration with the team at Hackney Council.
Key activities included:
Setting the scope, or boundaries of the discussion, by identifying what decisions citizens could meaningfully influence
Prioritising topics that jury members would need to learn about to have informed discussions on the topic and organising speakers
Laying the groundwork for impact: engaging with relevant council decision-makers and departments who would be responsible for taking recommendations forward
Session design: mapping goals, inputs and outputs of each session and designing activities (see high-level design below)
Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 3 | Session 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stages | Group forming Learning about challenges |
Learning about solutions | Co-creation | Recommendations |
Goal | Learn about the challenge: the risk of extreme heat to people and place | Learn about the solutions: what can people and places do to prepare? | Jury members develop ideas alongside specialists about what we can do | Write and agree recommendations about what the council and others should do |
Inputs | - Introduction to climate adaptation - Share survey results and personal experiences - The impact of extreme heat on people, health care and places |
- How Hackney currently responds - Case studies and stories from other countries - Place-based solutions - People-based solutions |
Speakers / topics as requested by participants |
n/a |
Outputs |
Long list of problems to solve, grouped into themes |
Prioritised list of 6 ‘How might we…’ questions |
Long list of ideas about solutions |
8-10 priority recommendations |
Participant recruitment
Jury members were recruited by using a democratic lottery. This involved sending 4000 letters to a random selection of households, inviting people to register their interest in taking part.
From there, Sortition Foundation selected a group by computer to be broadly reflective of the borough in terms of their:
Demographics and attitudes of the 15 jury members. Please see the full report for how this compares to the borough as a whole.
age
gender
ethnicity
disability
education level
housing tenure
attitudes to climate change
Wider community engagement
The Citizens’ Climate Jury sat within a wider process of community engagement. This aimed to hear experiences and ideas from people most at risk from extreme heat and get feedback on the proposed session design.
Engagement methods included:
A survey led by Hackney Council to understand local perceptions of extreme heat, which received 480 responses
Meetings with community groups, including a local tenants’ and residents’ association and two older adults groups
Ideas shared during wider engagement
Insights from the wider engagement included:
There is a lack of knowledge about the risks of extreme heat
People in an at-risk groups don’t always self-identify as ‘vulnerable’
Many older adults do not use the internet - so online cannot be the only method to communicate the risks of extreme heat
Many other countries and cultures are well adapted to extreme heat - how can we learn from them?
These insights were fed into the jury design and information speakers were asked to cover.
Session delivery
The Citizens’ Climate Jury took place across four evenings. Jury members were guided through three stages:
Learning about the topic from a range of speakers and each other’s experiences
Dialogue and deliberation – processing the information they had heard and weighing up potential ways forward
Decision-making - working together to make trade-offs and agree a final set of recommendations
A key feature of the design was the co-creation session in which jury members worked with speakers, specialists and council officers to develop ideas for recommendations together. Whilst there was a risk of power imbalance between ‘people with lanyards’ and local residents, the session was designed to ensure the jury members held final decision making power.
Recommendations
Jury members worked together to prioritise, draft and peer-review a final set of nine recommendations directed towards the council and others. The recommendations called for:
Targeting emergency response and communication
Indoor cooling off spaces
Outreach for street homeless people
Quick fixes to upgrade existing buildings
Creating cool routes and green spaces
Investing in healthcare providers
Incentivising companies to build heatwave compliant new builds
Looking at the whole built environment on new developments
Enforcing and updating building regulations
In the final session, residents presented these recommendations to the Mayor of Hackney and Director of Climate, Homes and Economy.
Impact
The Hackney Citizens’ Climate Jury had a direct impact on the actions of the council in preparing for extreme heat. The council’s formal response to the recommendations outlined their commitment to:
develop a new communications approach tailored to those who are most vulnerable to the impact of extreme heat
open, map and promote cool spaces, such as council buildings, libraries and shaded areas
increase Hackney’s street tree canopy coverage within areas most in need
incentivise companies to exceed building regulations to raise environmental standards
develop an Urban Forest Plan to protect, manage and increase tree canopy
What’s more, council officers shared how working with speakers and specialists through the process resulted in new partnerships and project opportunities.
The project is featured in by London Councils’ report London Leading: Case Studies in Climate Resilience Leadership.